Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6848 14
Original file (NR6848 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR6848-14

aA

coed
47 Vdiiuatby évio

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

subj: TS 3:10, 200-0

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 17 May 14 w/attachment
(2} HOMC MIQ memo dtd 12 Jan 15
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the illegible service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry. A copy of the contested
entry is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting cf

EE reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining ©
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. The service record page 11 on which the contested entry
appears also includes an uncontested entry.
c. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's
case has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
illegible service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")
entry located in the Field folder of the Official Military Personnel
File, image 6. This is to be accomplished by reconstructing the page
11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the entry
so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

| A. fest

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

S. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a) has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14

    Original file (NR9378 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05979-06

    Original file (05979-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 26 April 2000 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14

    Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11847 12

    Original file (11847 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 27 October 2012 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Genteman and Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10

    Original file (04627-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14

    Original file (NR3392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08514-07

    Original file (08514-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 1 August 2005 and her undated rebuttal, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Willis and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...